Search Results
Other Library

Search Conditions
Case: Insensitive  Construct: As a phrase  Hits Per Page: 5

Terms: law

123 File(s) Searched 81 Match(es) Found

Match(es) 46 to 50


  • File Name: PGL63.html
    Modified: 20 August 2002
    Title: A Proposal Concerning the General Line
  • 5 Occurence(s) of the search term lawDescription:
        If the general line of the international communist movement is onesidedly reduced to "peaceful coexistence", "peaceful competition" and "peaceful transition", this is to violate the revolutionary principles of the 1957 Declaration and the 1960 Statement, to discard the historical mission of proletarian world revolution, and to depart from the revolutionary teachings of Marxism-Leninis.     The general line of the international communist movement should reflect the general law of development of world histor.The revolutionary struggles of the proletariat and the people in various countries go through different stages and they all have their own characteristics, but they will not transcend the general law of development of world histor

  • File Name: PGL65.pdf
    Modified: 5 September 2006
    Title:
  • 48 Occurence(s) of the search term lawDescription:
    Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union WXJ12b Y u34 567u 90 * abcdecd ( fg ) 1965 hj1d kl: ( m ) 3050‹1104 00270 ( t ) 00240 ( u ) 3‹E‹578S 3‹E‹578P WXJ12bYu34 567u90 * abcdecd ( fg ) 1965 hj1d kl: ( m ) 3050‹1104 00270 ( t ) 00240 ( u ) 3‹E‹578S 3‹E‹578P . THE POLEMIC ON THE GENERAL LINE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT From Marx to Mao ML © Digital Reprints 2006 THE POLEMIC ON THE GENERAL LINE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT FOREIGN LANGUAGES PRESS PEKING 1965 THE POLEMIC ON THE GENERAL LINE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT FOREIGN LANGUAGES PRESS Printed in the People¹s Republic of China C O N T E N T S A PROPOSAL CONCERNING THE GENERAL LINE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT The Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in Reply to the Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union of March 30, 1963 (June 14, 1963) THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEADERSHIP OF THE CPSU AND OURSELVES Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (September 6, 1963) THE DIFFERENCES BEGAN WITH THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE CPSU THE SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES OF THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE CPSU THE 1957 MOSCOW MEETING OF FRATERNAL PARTIES THE GROWTH OF THE REVISIONISM OF THE CPSU LEADERSHIP THE SURPRISE ASSAULT ON THE CPC BY THE LEADERSHIP OF THE CPSU THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE TWO LINES AT THE 1960 MEETING OF FRATERNAL PARTIES THE REVISIONISM OF THE CPSU LEADERSHIP BECOMES SYSTEMATIZED AN ADVERSE CURRENT THAT IS OPPOSED TO MARXISM- LENINISM AND IS SPLITTING THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT WHAT HAVE THE FACTS OF THE PAST SEVEN YEARS DEMONSTRATED? Appendix I Outline of Views on the Question of Peaceful Transition (November 10, 1957) Appendix II Statement of the Delegation of the Communist Party of China at the Bucharest Meeting of Fraternal Parties (June 26, 1960) 1 55 59 67 70 75 79 83 89 93 99 105 109 Appendix III The Five Proposals for Settlement of the Differences and Attainment of Unity Contained in the Letter of the Central Committee of the CPC in Reply to the Letter of Information of the Central Committee of the CPSU (September 10, 1960) ON THE QUESTION OF STALIN Second Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (September 13, 1963) IS YUGOSLAVIA A SOCIALIST COUNTRY? Third Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (September 26, 1963) THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE CAPITAL IN YUGOSLAV CITIES YUGOSLAV COUNTRYSIDE SWAMPED BY CAPITALISM THE DEGENERATION OF SOCIALIST ECONOMY OWNED BY THE WHOLE PEOPLE INTO CAPlTALIST ECONOMY A DEPENDENCY OF U.S. IMPERIALISM A COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY SPECIAL DETACHMENT OF U.S. IMPERIALISM THE DEGENERATION OF THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT INTO THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE BOURGEOISIE THE PRINCIPLEED STAND OF THE CPC ON THE QUESTION OF YUGOSLAVIA HAS TITO ³REMOVED HIS ERRORS²? OR DOES KHRUSHCHOV REGARD TITO AS HIS TEACHER? BRIEF CONCLUSION APOLOGISTS OF NEO-COLONIALISM Fourth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (October 22, 1964) ABOLITION OF THE TASK OF COMBATING IMPERIALISM AND COLONIALISM PRESCRIPTIONS FOR ABOLISHING THE REVOLUTION OF THE OPPRESSED NATIONS OPPOSITION TO WARS OF NATIONAL LIBERATION THE AREAS IN WHICH CONTEMPORARY WORLD CONTRADICTIONS ARE CONCENTRATED 113 115 139 145 147 154 161 166 171 175 177 181 185 188 193 197 200 DISTORTION OF THE LENINIST VIEW OF LEADERSHIP IN THE REVOLUTION THE PATH OF NATIONALISM AND DEGENERATION AN EXAMPLE OF SOCIAL-CHAUVINISM AGAINST THE ³THEORY OF RACISM² AND THE ³THEORY OF THE YELLOW PERIL² RESURRECTING THE OLD REVISIONISM IN A NEW GUISE TWO DIFFERENT LINES ON THE QUESTION OF WAR AND PEACE Fifth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (November 19, 1963) THE LESSONS OF HISTORY THE GREATEST FRAUD THE QUESTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF PREVENTING A NEW WORLD WAR NUCLEAR FETISHISM AND NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL ARE THE THEORETICAL BASIS AND GUIDING POLICY OF MODERN REVISIONISM FIGHT OR CAPITULATE? THE ROAD IN DEFENCE OF PEACE AND THE ROAD LEADING TO WAR PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE ‹ TWO DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED POLICIES Sixth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (December 12, 1963) LENIN AND STALIN¹S POLICY OF PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA UPHOLDS LENIN¹S POLICY OF PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE THE GENERAL LINE OF ³PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE² OF THE CPSU LEADERS THREE DIFFERENCES OF PRINCIPLE THE CPSU LEADERS¹ GENERAL LINE OF ³PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE² CATERS TO U.S. IMPERIALISM SOVIET-U S. COLLABORATION IS THE HEART AND SOUL OF THE CPSU LEADERS¹ GENERAL LINE OF ³PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE² A FEW WORDS OF ADVICE TO THE LEADERS OF THE CPSU 203 206 209 212 216 221 224 230 235 242 249 254 259 262 270 275 278 289 295 300 THE LEADERS OF THE CPSU ARE THE GREATEST SPLITTERS OF OUR TIMES Seventh Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (February 4, 1964) A REVIEW OF HISTORY EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS THE GREATEST SPLITTERS OF OUR TIMES REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF BEING ANTI-SOVIET REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF SEIZING THE LEADERSHIP REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF FRUSTRATING THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY AND VIOLATING INTERNATIONAL DISCIPLINE REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF SUPPORTING THE ANTI-PARTY GROUPS OF FRATERNAL PARTIES THE PRESENT PUBLIC DEBATE THE WAY TO DEFEND AND STRENGTHEN UNITY THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION AND KHRUSHCHOV¹S REVISIONISM Eighth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (March 31, 1964) A DISCIPLE OF BERNSTEIN AND KAUTSKY VIOLENT REVOLUTION IS A UNIVERSAL law OF PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION OUR STRUGGLE AGAINST KHRUSHCHOV¹S REVISIONISM SOPHISTRY CANNOT ALTER HISTORY LIES CANNOT COVER UP REALITY REFUTATION OF THE ³PARLIAMENTARY ROAD² REFUTATION OF ³OPPOSITION TO LEFT OPPORTUNISM² TWO DIFFERENT LINES. TWO DIFFERENT RESULTS FROM BROWDER AND TITO TO KHRUSHCHOV OUR HOPES ON KHRUSHCHOV'S PHONEY COMMUNISM AND ITS HISTORICAL LESSONS FOR THE WORLD Ninth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU (July 14, 1964) SOCIALIST SOCIETY AND THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT 303 306 313 318 326 331 336 341 348 354 359 362 366 370 375 382 388 392 399 403 411 415 418 ANTAGONISTIC CLASSES AND CLASS STRUGGLE EXIST IN THE SOVIET UNION THE SOVIET PRIVILEDGED STRATUM AND THE REVISIONIST KHRUSHCHOV CLIQUE REFUTATION OF THE SO-CALLED STATE OF THE WHOLE PEOPLE REFUTATION OF THE SO-CALLED PARTY OF THE WHOLE PEOPLE KHRUSHCHOV¹S PHONEY COMMUNISM HISTORICAL LESSONS OF THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT WHY KHRUSHCHOV FELL (November 21, 1964) APPENDICES THE LETTER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE CPSU TO THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE CPC (March 30, 1963) OPEN LETTER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION TO ALL PARTY ORGANISATIONS, TO ALL COMMUNISTS OF THE SOVIET UNION (July 14, 1963) 428 436 444 453 459 467 481 495 526 A PROPOSAL CONCERNING THE GENERAL LINE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT The Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in Reply to the Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union of March 30, 1963 (June 14, 1963) 3 June 14, 1963 The Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Dear Comrades, The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China has studied the letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union of March 30, 1963. All who have the unity of the socialist camp and the international communist movement at heart are deeply concerned about the talks between the Chinese and Soviet Parties and hope that our talks will help to eliminate differences, strengthen unity and create favourable conditions for convening a meeting of representatives of all the Communist and Workers¹ Partie. It is the common and sacred duty of the Communist and Workers¹ Parties of all countries to uphold and strengthen the unity of the international communist movemen

  • File Name: PGLtc.html
    Modified: 20 August 2002
    Title: Polemic on the General Line Communist Movement
  • 1 Occurence(s) of the search term lawDescription:
    Contents (Abbreviated) A PROPOSAL CONCERNING THE GENERAL LINE OF THE  INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT    The Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in Reply to the Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union of March 30, 1963   (June 14, 1963 )   1  THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIFFERENCES BE-  TWEEN THE LEADERSHIP OF THE CPSU AND OURSELVES    Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (September 6 , 1963 )  (more) 55 ON THE QUESTION OF STALIN Second Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (September 13, 1963 )  115 IS YUGOSLAVIA A SOCIALIST COUNTRY? Third Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (September 26, 1963 )  (more) 139 APOLOGISTS OF NEO-COLONIALISM Fourth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (October 22, 1963 )  (more) 185 TWO DIFFERENT LINES ON THE QUESTION OF WAR AND  PEACE Fifth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (November 19, 1963 )  (more) 221 PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE -- TWO DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED  POLICIES Sixth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (December 12, 1963 )  (more) 259 THE LEADERS OF THE CPSU ARE THE GREATEST SPLITTERS  OF OUR TIMES Seventh Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (February 4, 1964 )  (more) 303 THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION AND KHRUSHCHOV'S  REVISIONISM Eighth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (March 31, 1964 )  (more) 359 ON KHRUSHCHOV'S PHONEY COMMUNISM AND ITS HISTORICAL  LESSONS FOR THE WORLD Nineth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (July 14, 1964 )  (more) 415 [Transcriber's Note: Since this document had already been prepared on the basis  of a separate pamphlet edition, no page references are given in the expanded  listing of content.-- DJR]  WHY KHRUSHCHOV FELL   (November 21, 1964 )   481   APPENDICES  THE LETTER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE CPSU TO  THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE CPC   (March 30, 1963 )   495   OPEN LETTER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUN-  IST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION TO ALL PARTY ORGAN-  ISATIONS, TO ALL COMMUNISTS OF THE SOVIET UNION   (July 14, 1963 )   526   From Marxto Mao ReadingGuide Other Texts andDocuments Complete Tableof Contents Below Communist Party of China THE POLEMIC ON THE GENERAL LINE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT Table of Contents (Complete) A PROPOSAL CONCERNING THE GENERAL LINE OF THE  INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST MOVEMENT    The Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in Reply to the Letter of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union of March 30, 1963   (June 14, 1963 )   1  THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE DIFFERENCES BE-  TWEEN THE LEADERSHIP OF THE CPSU AND OURSELVES    Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (September 6 , 1963 ) 55  THE DIFFERENCES BEGAN WITH THE 20TH CONGRESS OF     THE CPSU  THE SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES OF THE 20TH CONGRESS OF     THE CPSU  THE 1957 MOSCOW MEETING OF FRATERNAL PARTIES  THE GROWTH OF THE REVISIONISM OF THE CPSU LEADER-     SHIP  THE SURPRISE ASSAULT ON THE CPC BY THE LEADERSHIP     OF THE CPSU  THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN THE TWO LINES AT THE 1960     MEETING OF FRATERNAL PARTIES  THE REVISIONISM OF THE CPSU LEADERSHIP BECOMES     SYSTEMATIZED  AN ADVERSE CURRENT THAT IS OPPOSED TO MARXISM-     LENINISM AND IS SPLITTING THE INTERNATIONAL     COMMUNIST MOVEMENT  WHAT HAVE THE FACTS OF THE PAST SEVEN YEARS     DEMONSTRATED? 59  67 70  75  79  83  89   93  99 Appendix I  Outline of Views on the Question of Peaceful Transition     (November 10, 1957 ) Appendix II  Statement of the Delegation of the Communist Party of     China at the Bucharest Meeting of Fraternal Parties     (June 26, 1960 ) Appendix III  The Five Proposals for Settlement of the Differences     and Attainment of Unity Contained in the Letter of the     Central Committee of the CPC in Reply to the Letter of     Information of the Central Committee of the CPSU     (September 10, 1960 )   105    109      113  ON THE QUESTION OF STALIN Second Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (September 13, 1963 )  115 IS YUGOSLAVIA A SOCIALIST COUNTRY? Third Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (September 26, 1963 ) 139  THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRIVATE CAPITAL IN YUGOSLAV     CITIES  YUGOSLAV COUNTRYSIDE SWAMPED BY CAPITALISM  THE DEGENERATION OF SOCIALIST ECONOMY OWNED BY     THE WHOLE PEOPLE INTO CAPITALIST ECONOMY  A DEPENDENCY OF U.S. IMPERIALISM  A COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY SPECIAL DETACHMENT OF     U.S. IMPERIALISM.  THE DEGENERATION OF THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLE-     TARIAT INTO THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE BOURGEOISIE  THE PRINCIPLED STAND OF THE CPC ON THE QUESTION OF     YUGOSLAVIA  HAS TITO "REMOVED HIS ERRORS"? OR DOES KHRUSHCHOV     REGARD TITO AS HIS TEACHER?  BRIEF CONCLUSION  145 147  154 161  166  171  175  177 181  APOLOGISTS OF NEO-COLONIALISM Fourth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (October 22, 1963 ) 185  ABOLITION OF THE TASK OF COMBATING IMPERIALISM     AND COLONIALISM  PRESCRIPTIONS FOR ABOLISHING THE REVOLUTION OF     THE OPPRESSED NATIONS  OPPOSITION TO WARS OF NATIONAL LIBERATION  THE AREAS IN WHICH CONTEMPORARY WORLD CONTRA-     DICTIONS ARE CONCENTRATED  DISTORTION OF THE LENINIST VIEW OF LEADERSHIP IN     THE REVOLUTION  THE PATH OF NATIONALISM AND DEGENERATION  AN EXAMPLE OF SOCIAL-CHAUVINISM  AGAINST THE "THEORY OF RACISM" AND THE "THEORY OF     THE YELLOW PERIL"  RESURRECTING THE OLD REVISIONISM IN A NEW GUISE  188  193 197  200  203 206 209  212 216  TWO DIFFERENT LINES ON THE QUESTION OF WAR AND  PEACE Fifth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (November 19, 1963 ) 221  THE LESSONS OF HISTORY  THE GREATEST FRAUD  THE QUESTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF PREVENTING A     NEW WORLD WAR  NUCLEAR FETISHISM AND NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL ARE THE     THEORETICAL BASIS AND GUIDING POLICY OF MODERN     REVISIONISM  FIGHT OR CAPITULATE?  THE ROAD IN DEFENSE OF PEACE AND THE LEADING TO     WAR  224 230  235   242 249  254  PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE -- TWO DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSED  POLICIES Sixth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (December 12, 1963 ) 259  LENIN AND STALIN'S POLICY OF PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE  THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF CHINA UPHOLDS LENIN'S     POLICY OF PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE  THE GENERAL LINE OF "PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE" OF THE     CPSU LEADERS  THREE DIFFERENCES OF PRINCIPLE  THE CPSU LEADERS' GENERAL LINE OF "PEACEFUL CO-     EXISTENCE" CATERS TO U. S. IMPERIALISM  SOVIET-U.S. COLLABORATION IS THE HEART AND SOUL     OF THE CPSU LEADERS' GENERAL LINE OF "PEACEFUL     COEXISTENCE"  A FEW WORDS OF ADVICE TO THE LEADERS OF THE CPSU  262  270  275 278  289   295 300  THE LEADERS OF THE CPSU ARE THE GREATEST SPLITTERS  OF OUR TIMES Seventh Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (February 4, 1964 ) 303  A REVIEW OF HISTORY  EXPERIENCE AND LESSONS  THE GREATEST SPLITTERS OF OUR TIMES  REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF BEING ANTI-SOVIET  REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF SEIZING THE LEADERSHIP  REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF FRUSTRATING THE WILL     OF THE MAJORITY AND VIOLATING INTERNATIONAL     DISCIPLINE  REFUTATION OF THE CHARGE OF SUPPORTING THE ANTI-     PARTY GROUPS OF FRATERNAL PARTIES  THE PRESENT PUBLIC DEBATE  THE WAY TO DEFEND AND STRENGTHEN UNITY  306 313 318 326 331   336  341 348 354  THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION AND KHRUSHCHOV'S  REVISIONISM Eighth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (March 31, 1964 ) 359  A DISCIPLE OF BERNSTEIN AND KAUTSKY  VIOLENT REVOLUTION IS A UNIVERSAL law OF PROLE-     TARIAN REVOLUTION  OUR STRUGGLE AGAINST KHRUSHCHOV'S REVISIONISM  SOPHISTRY CANNOT ALTER HISTORY  LIES CANNOT COVER UP REALITY  REFUTATION OF THE "PARLIAMENTARY ROAD"  REFUTATION OF "OPPOSITION TO LEFT OPPORTUNISM"  TWO DIFFERENT LINES. TWO DIFFERENT RESULTS  FROM BROWDER AND TITO TO KHRUSHCHOV  OUR HOPES  362  366 370 375 382 388 392 399 403 411  ON KHRUSHCHOV'S PHONEY COMMUNISM AND ITS HISTORICAL  LESSONS FOR THE WORLD Nineth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (July 14, 1964 ) 415 [Transcriber's Note: Since this document had already been prepared on the basis  of a separate pamphlet edition, no page references are given her.-- DJR]   SOCIALIST SOCIETY AND THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE     PROLETAIRIAT  ANTAGONISTIC CLASSES AND CLASS STRUGGLE EXIST     IN THE SOVIET UNION  THE SOVIET PRIVILEGED STRATUM AND THE REVISION-     IST KHRUSHCHOV CLIQUE  REFUTATION OF THE SO-CALLED STATE OF THE WHOLE     PEOPLE  REFUTATION OF THE SO-CALLED PARTY OF THE ENTIRE     PEOPLE  KHRUSHCHOV'S PHONEY COMMUNISM  HISTORICAL LESSONS OF THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE     PROLETARIAT  WHY KHRUSHCHOV FELL   (November 21, 1964 )   481   APPENDICES  THE LETTER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE CPSU TO  THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE CPC   (March 30, 1963 )   495   OPEN LETTER OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUN-  IST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION TO ALL PARTY ORGAN-  ISATIONS, TO ALL COMMUNISTS OF THE SOVIET UNION   (July 14, 1963 )   526   From Marxto Mao ReadingGuide Other Texts andDocuments

  • File Name: PH72.html
    Modified: 29 July 2003
    Title: Politics and History
  • 148 Occurence(s) of the search term lawDescription:
    Politics and History Louis Althusser  Politics and History  Montesquieu, Rousseau, Hegel and Marx    Translated from the French by Ben Brewster     'Montesquieu: Politics and History' first published by Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1959, © PUF,1959; 'The Social Contract' first published in Cahiers pour l'Analyse, n.8: L'Impensé de Jean- Jacques Rousseau, n.d., © Le Graphe; 'Marx's Relation to Hegel' first published in Hegel et la Pensée Moderne by Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1970, © PUF, 1970.  This translation first published, 1972 © NLB, 1972  Prepared © for the Internet by David J. Romagnolo, djr@marx2mao.org (July 2003)   Acknowledgments   6 Translator's note   7   Part One  MONTESQUIEU: POLITICS AND HISTORY  Foreword   13 1. A Revolution in Method   17 2. A New Theory of law   31 3. The Dialectic of History   43 4. 'There are Three Governments . . .'   61 5. The Myth of the Separation of Powers   87 6. Montesquieu's Parti Pris   96 Conclusion   107 Bibliography   108   Part Two  ROUSSEAU: THE SOCIAL CONTRACT  Foreword   113 1. Posing the Problem   116 2. The Solution of the Problem: Discrepancy I   125 3. The Contract and Alienation   135 4. Total Alienation and Exchange: Discrepancy II   140 5.  Particular Interest and General Interest, Particular Will and General Will: Discrepancy III   146 6.    Flight Forward in Ideology or Regression in the Economy: Discrepancy IV   155   Part Three  MARX'S RELATION TO HEGEL   161  Index   187  page 6   Acknowledgments : We are grateful to J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd for their kind permission to use extracts from The Social Contract and Discourses, translated by G. D. H. Cole, and from Émile, translated by Barbara Foxley, both published in Everyman's Librar.      page 7   Translator's note : Quotations from the works of Montesquieu in Part One of this book have in general been taken from the four-volume translation by Thomas Nugent entitled The Works of Monsieur de Montesquieu, published in London in 1777. References to the Spirit of Laws give the Book number in Roman and the chapter number in Arabic numerals: thus, SL, VIII, 9 means The Spirit of Laws, Book VIII, Chapter 9. Quotations from Rousseau in Parts One and Two have been taken either from The Social Contract and Discourses, translated by G. D. H. Cole, in the Everyman's Library edition of 1966, or from Émile, translated by Barbara Foxley, in the Everyman's Library edition of 1957. Page references are to these edition

  • File Name: PRKR64.html
    Modified: 20 August 2002
    Title: Proletarian Revolution . . . Khrshchov's Revisionism
  • 18 Occurence(s) of the search term lawDescription:
    359-413. Prepared © for the Internet by David J. Romagnolo, djr@cruzio.com (March 1998) [Transcriber's Note: In the printed edition, quoted passages of any length appear in the samesize type, but are indented as a bloc.In the following on-line version, these passages are NOT indented as a block, but appear in a smaller point font.-- DJR] C O N T E N T S THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION AND KHRUSHCHOV'S  REVISIONISM Eighth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU   (March 31, 1964 ) 359  A DISCIPLE OF BERNSTEIN AND KAUTSKY  VIOLENT REVOLUTION IS A UNIVERSAL law OF PROLE-     TARIAN REVOLUTION  OUR STRUGGLE AGAINST KHRUSHCHOV'S REVISIONISM  SOPHISTRY CANNOT ALTER HISTORY  LIES CANNOT COVER UP REALITY  REFUTATION OF THE "PARLIAMENTARY ROAD"  REFUTATION OF "OPPOSITION TO LEFT OPPORTUNISM"  TWO DIFFERENT LINES. TWO DIFFERENT RESULTS  FROM BROWDER AND TITO TO KHRUSHCHOV  OUR HOPES  362  366 370 375 382 388 392 399 403 411  page 359 THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION AND KHRUSHCHOV'S REVISIONISM Eighth Comment on the Open Letter of the Central Committee of the CPSU by the Editorial Departments of Renmin Ribao (People's Daily ) and Hongqi (Red Flag ) (March 31, 1964)    page 360 [blank] page 361    THE present article will discuss the familiar question of "peaceful transitio.It has become familiar and has everybody's attention because Khrushchov raised it at the 20th Congress of the CPSU and rounded it into a complete system in the form of a programme at the 22nd Congress, where he pitted his revisionist views against the Marxist-Leninist view


    [Search Again]
    • 81 file(s) matching your search criteria found.
    Narrow the search by searching 81 File(s)?

    Case:      Construct: